The goal of this study is to fill the paucity of second line endovascular treatment for acute deep venous thrombus (DVT) by using catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) as adjunctive second-line treatments for acute DVT patients who show no improvement after an initial anticoagulation trial for one week. The main questions the study aims to answer are: \- Are adjunctive use of endovascular interventional treatments as second-line to DVT treatment safe and efficient? Participants will be followed with repeat US at 1 week after initial DVT to assess for response to anticoagulation treatment. If there is significant residual thrombus with minimal or no response to treatment, participants will be offered enrollment to the study in the office or inpatient setting. Enrolled participants will be randomized into control or intervention arms with 1:1 ratio. Researchers will compare follow-up Villalta and Marder scores between groups to see whether endovascular interventions are safe and efficient.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Efficacy of Endovascular Treatments Clinically
Timeframe: 30 days
Efficacy of Endovascular Treatments Clinically
Timeframe: 90 days
Efficacy of Endovascular Treatments Clinically
Timeframe: 180 days
Efficacy of Endovascular Treatments Clinically
Timeframe: 12 months
Efficacy of Endovascular Treatments Sonographically
Timeframe: 30 days
Efficacy of Endovascular Treatments Sonographically
Timeframe: 90 days
Efficacy of Endovascular Treatments Sonographically
Timeframe: 180 days
Efficacy of Endovascular Treatments Sonographically
Timeframe: 12 months