Comparing T-stenting And Minimal Protrusion With External Minicrush for Treatment of Complex Coro… (NCT06484647) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Comparing T-stenting And Minimal Protrusion With External Minicrush for Treatment of Complex Coronary Bifurcation
Italy382 participantsStarted 2024-06-01
Plain-language summary
Nowadays, no studies compare the T-stenting And Minimal Protrusion (TAP) and External Minicrush techniques in treating complex coronary bifurcation, so eventually, procedural, clinical and safety differences remain unknown.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients \>18 years of age
* Patients with an indication for PCI, including chronic coronary syndrome and acute coronary syndromes (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina)
* Patients with at least one true coronary bifurcation according to the Medina classification 1.1.1, 0.1.1, 1.0.1, 0.0.1
Exclusion Criteria:
* Patients who do not want or cannot sign the informed consent for the procedure.
* Patients with severe peripheral vascular disease that limits vascular access to the point of making the procedure unsafe.
* Patients with a life expectancy of \<1 year.
* Patients with planned major surgery require prolonged discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy.
* Pregnant women.
* Patients who cannot take antiplatelet therapy for any reason.