CompletedNot Applicable

Effects of an Instability Training Program Using Global Versus Selective Instability Devices

Spain20 participantsStarted 2019-11-18

Plain-language summary

The goal of this clinical trial was to compare the effects of a 4-week balance training programme using a GID or SID on functional dynamic balance and functional ankle stability in young healthy amateur soccer players. The main question it aimed to answer are: 1\. Are there differences between using GID or SID in improving dynamic balance according to the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) and the Emery test, and in improving functional ankle stability according to the Side Hop Test? Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: GID balance training (i.e., with a BOSU®) and SID balance training (i.e., with Blackboard). The randomization and allocation were performed using the sealed envelope method. Both groups performed on a 4-weeks balance training program with the assigned device. Participants were asked to: * Perform a 5-minute conventional warm-up (cycling and active anke mobility exercises) * Perform four balance exercises with a 3-kg medicine ball, on the unstable surface device assigned to each group (explanation of the exercises in the detailed description) Researchers compared the results of the GID group with those of the SID group to determine the differences between devices in the improvement of dynamic balance and functional stability of the foot and ankle.

Who can participate

Age range

16 Years – 35 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * No lower limb surgery during the last year prior to participation * No history of pain in either ankles, knees or hips during the two months prior to participation * Not having sprained either ankle for at least three months prior to participation Exclusion Criteria: * Had participated in lower limb balance and proprioception programmes or had suffered balance alterations such as vertigo, vestibular or central disorders

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Dynamic Balance (mSEBT)

Timeframe: Pre and after 4 weeks of intervention

Dynamic Balance (Emery Test )

Timeframe: Pre and after 4 weeks of intervention

Ankle stability (Side Hop Test)

Timeframe: Pre and after 4 weeks of intervention

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06472648

SponsorUniversity of Valencia

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2020-02-21

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Balance Instability Training trials

Plain-language summary

Who can participate

Age range

16 Years – 35 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.