THERApy De-escalation for TESTicular Cancer (NCT06309745) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
THERApy De-escalation for TESTicular Cancer
United Kingdom30 participantsStarted 2024-06-24
Plain-language summary
THERATEST is looking to collect data from 30 patients actively receiving de-escalation treatments or other standard of care treatments in two UK hospitals. THERATEST is a feasibility study to determine whether patients are willing to be recruited, the impact of de-escalation treatments on patients' cancers and quality of life, whether we should proceed with these treatments in a larger study, and if so how the study should be conducted. A feasibility study prepares the ground for a larger study and improves the chances of the subsequent study producing valuable evidence, and helps to avoid wasting precious resources on larger trials that are unlikely to be informative. We hope that information from THERATEST will bridge the current knowledge gap and allow clinicians to design bigger trials to actively compare the different treatment strategies.
Who can participate
Age range
16 Years
Sex
MALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
. Clinical stage II (standard of care cross-sectional imaging).
. Ability to comply with the protocol, including but not limited to, completion of the patient-reported outcome questionnaires.
. Stage IIA and \<3cm IIB with unifocal ipsilateral lymph node within rRPLND template.
. Negative or mildly elevated serum tumour markers, defined as:
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
FEASIBILITY of recruitment and retention
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 3 year
. Raised AFP \> 10ng/ml that does not fall to \<10ng/ml following orchidectomy
. Previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy for the disease under study.
. Previous or concurrent malignancy other than testicular cancer, unless treated with curative intent and with no known active disease present for ≥2 years before enrolment and felt to be at low risk for recurrence by the treating physician (for example: non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo maligna; breast ductal carcinoma in situ; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; urothelial papillary non-invasive carcinoma or urothelial carcinoma in situ).
. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with evaluation of study intervention or interpretation of patient safety or study results such as medical comorbidities impacting on QoL or medical conditions or other disorders that would affect adherence to study requirements