CompletedNot Applicable

Comparing the Effect of Spinal Bupivacaine Versus Spinal Prilocaine on Maternal Blood Pressure in Cesarean Section

Egypt120 participantsStarted 2024-04-21

Plain-language summary

one of the most common complications associated with spinal anesthesia is hypotension, which can have adverse effects on both the mother and the fetus. The present study compare prilocaine versus bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia on hypotension and there effect on maternal outcomes.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 35 Years

SexFEMALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Pregnant \>36 weeks singleton baby * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 2 * Age : between 18 years old and 35 years old Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant women with cardiac disease and history of psychiatric illness * Pregnant women who received spinal anesthesia and converted to general anesthesia * Women who have sensitivity to local anesthetics, * Women who have Eclampsia, abruption placenta or placenta previa * Women who have coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 80,000/cm3, myasthenia

What they're measuring

Maternal arterial blood pressure

Timeframe: at base line before induction and every 3 minute during the first 15 min after spinal then every 5 mins until the end of surgery and every 1 hour postoperatively for 6 hours

Trial details

NCT IDNCT06290583

SponsorSouth Valley University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2024-12-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Spinal Anesthetics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use trials