The goal of this clinical trial was to compare the clinical and radiographic success of laser versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars. The main questions it aimed to answer was: • Does laser pulpotomy has higher clinical and radiographic success rate as formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars? Participants were selected according to eligibility criteria to undergo pulpotomy for their lower primary molars under local anesthesia using one of the following techniques: * Group 1: Formocresol * Group 2: Diode laser Group 3: Er:CrYSGG laser Clinical and radiographic follow up were performed for 18 months
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Clinical and radiographic success
Timeframe: 18 months