Computer Guided Modified Ridge Splitting Versus Free Hand Technique in Horizontal Deficiency in P… (NCT06195761) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Computer Guided Modified Ridge Splitting Versus Free Hand Technique in Horizontal Deficiency in Posterior Mandible
Egypt18 participantsStarted 2026-05-15
Plain-language summary
To assess the accuracy of the computer assessed guides in horizontal bone augmentation achieved at posterior mandible using guided modified ridge splitting technique versus free hand modified ridge splitting technique
Who can participate
Age range
25 Years – 55 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* posterior mandible with horizontal deficient alveolar ridge that is from 2 to 4 mm measured from the crest of the alveolar ridge buccolingually
* Age range from 25-55 years. No sex predilection.
* Patients free from any systemic conditions and bone metabolism diseases that might interfere with the surgical intervention, soft tissue or hard tissue healing.
* Patients of adequate alveolar bone width.
* Both genders males and females will be included
* Normal vertical dimension with normal inter-arch space. The minimum number of missing teeth in the posterior mandible alveolar ridge is two adjacent anterior teeth
Exclusion Criteria:
* Intra-bony lesions (e.g. cysts) or infections (e.g. abscess) that may retard the osteotomy healing.
* Previous grafting procedures in the edentulous area.
* General contraindications to implant surgery.
* Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
* Untreated periodontitis.
* Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
* Uncontrolled diabetes.
* Pregnant or nursing.
* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised
* Heavy smokers
* Patients undergo medication interfere with bone healing
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Accuracy of the Computer Assessed Guide in the study group