The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V116 compared to PPSV23 in children and teenagers 2 through 17 years of age, who had completed routine pneumococcal vaccine as infants/toddlers. Researchers want to learn if V116 is as good as, or is better than the PPSV23 vaccine in terms of the antibody immune response. V116 and PPSV23 will be studied in children and teenagers who have a higher risk of getting pneumococcal disease (PD).
Age range
2 Years – 17 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Injection-site Adverse Events (AEs)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days postvaccination
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic AEs
Timeframe: Up to 5 days post vaccination
Percentage of Participants With Vaccine-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 6 months
Geometric Mean Titer of Serotype-specific Opsonophagocytic Activity (OPA) Responses
Timeframe: 30 days postvaccination