A Proof-of-Concept Study to Learn Whether Linvoseltamab Can Eliminate Abnormal Plasma Cells That … (NCT06140524) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingPhase 2
A Proof-of-Concept Study to Learn Whether Linvoseltamab Can Eliminate Abnormal Plasma Cells That May Lead to Multiple Myeloma in Adult Patients With High-Risk Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance or Non-High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
United States, Belgium, France116 participantsStarted 2024-09-16
Plain-language summary
This study is researching an investigational drug called linvoseltamab ("study drug") in participants at moderate risk of developing multiple myeloma (about 3 to 10% average annual risk), a group that consists of patients with precancerous conditions called High-Risk Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (HR-MGUS) and Non-High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (NHR-SMM).
The primary purpose of the study is to understand how well the study drug can eliminate abnormal plasma cells and laboratory signs of HR-MGUS and NHR-SMM.
The study is looking at several other research questions, including:
* How many participants treated with linvoseltamab have improvement of their HR-MGUS or NHR-SMM?
* What side effects may happen from taking the study drug?
* How much study drug is in the blood at different times?
* Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the drug less effective or could lead to side effects).
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. HR-MGUS or NHR-SMM as defined in the protocol
. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1
. Adequate hematologic and hepatic function, as described in the protocol
. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation
Exclusion criteria
. High-risk SMM, as defined in the protocol
. Evidence of any of myeloma-defining events, as described in the protocol
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Frequency of Adverse Events Interest (AEI) during the safety observation period
Timeframe: 35 days
2
Frequency of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) during the safety observation period
Timeframe: 35 days
3
Severity of TEAEs during the safety observation period
Timeframe: 35 days
4
Achievement of Complete Response (CR) as determined by the investigator
. Diagnosis of systemic light-chain amyloidosis, Waldenström macroglobulinemia (lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma), solitary plasmacytoma, or symptomatic MM
. Clinically significant cardiac or vascular disease within 3 months of study enrollment, as described in the protocol
. Any infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with intravenous (IV) anti-infectives within 28 days of the first dose of linvoseltamab
. Uncontrolled Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection; or other uncontrolled infection or unexplained signs of infection, as described in the protocol