According to the media, GHB is the main substance used for chemical submission. The national survey conducted by the Addictovigilance centre of Paris on drug-facilitated assaults shows that GHB is used, but only in a very small proportion of cases. However, the short detection times for this substance point to its possible under-detection (06-09h in blood, 10-12h in urine). A pilot research protocol in Ile de France focusing on capillary analysis is therefore being proposed to volunteer victims to overcome this bias and answer this question: is the massive use of GHB in chemical submission a myth or a reality?
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Evidence of exogenous GHB intake without the knowledge of the victims through hair analysis.
Timeframe: Samples taken between 2 and 6 months after the presumed events: GHB analysis in the hair can no longer be interpreted after 6 months due to the hydrosoluble nature of GHB and repetitive hair washing.