Safety and Performance Assessment of a First Four Arms on Demand Open Robotic Solution for Assist… (NCT06119568) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Safety and Performance Assessment of a First Four Arms on Demand Open Robotic Solution for Assisted PN, RN and RP
Spain15 participantsStarted 2023-11-01
Plain-language summary
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Bitrack System and its corresponding ElectroSurgical Endoscopic (ESE) instruments and Non-ElectroSurgical Endoscopic (NESE) instruments and accessories in patients with the indication of a robot assisted laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy (RN), Partial Nephrectomy (PN) or Radical Prostatectomy (RP), as applicable. HYROS-PRnP is a confirmatory study in which the hypothesis of the primary endpoint is that the ESE/NESE instruments perform as intended when controlled by Bitrack System which operates exclusively under surgeon's orders. The study shall refer to safety and performance of Bitrack System together with its accessories and corresponding ESE/NESE instruments. This study includes the data collected up to 30 days post-surgery and provides the evidence that the tested medical devices fulfill the GSPR.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 90 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Adult subjects between 18 and 90 years old who have provided written informed consent prior to any clinical investigation related procedures.
. Subjects who have been scheduled for a laparoscopic Radical/simple Nephrectomy surgery, laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy or laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy following the surgeon criteria.
. Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements to be evaluated for each study visit.
Exclusion criteria
. Pregnant or breastfeeding women at the time of the surgery.
. Subjects with severe concomitant illness that, at PI´s discretion, increases risk of therapeutic interventions or that have been submitted to multiple prior surgeries.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Lack of occurrence of a SAE related to the use of the medical devices under investigation during the intervention