The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to test the feasibility of running a full scale randomized controlled trial that compares the effect of the PQ-ResPOND intervention versus usual care to improve recurrent pain in children, adolescents, and young adults with severe neurologic impairment. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the study feasible and acceptable for participants? * Does PQ-ResPOND have a potential to be effective? Participants will: * answer surveys (their parents will) telling us about the child's pain, symptoms, and use of complementary therapies, and about their own psychological distress and satisfaction with care. * a group will receive the PQ-ResPOND intervention which consists of: * activating parents and providers by using the PediQUEST system, a web platform that administers surveys and generates feedback reports alerting parents and providers about the child's experience, AND * responding to child pain or discomfort by incorporating the Response team (members of the hospital's palliative care team) into the child's care to privde a standardized approach to managing recurrent pain. Researchers will use a comparison (control) group consisting of participants who will answer surveys and receive usual care (no feedback reports or consult with palliative care in this group) to see if a randomized design is feasible.
Age range
1 Year
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Recruitment rate
Timeframe: 16 months
Recruitment/month
Timeframe: 16 months
Randomization rate
Timeframe: 16 months
Suitability of screening/tracking
Timeframe: 16 months
Sample diversity
Timeframe: 16 months
Refusal reasons
Timeframe: 16 months
Dropout rate
Timeframe: 16 months
Demographics of dropouts
Timeframe: 16 months
Dropout reasons
Timeframe: 16 months
Intermittent attrition
Timeframe: 16 months
Adherence with answering surveys
Timeframe: 16 months
Feasibility of intervention delivery
Timeframe: 16 months
Participant's acceptability of the intervention
Timeframe: At week 12
Likelihood that participants would recommend study to others
Timeframe: At week 12
Participant's acceptability of intervention (qualitative)
Timeframe: At week 12
Clinician's acceptability of intervention (qualitative)
Timeframe: 16 months
Participant's overall satisfaction with the study
Timeframe: At study exit