Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Compared With Bisphosphonates in Children an… (NCT05972551) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Compared With Bisphosphonates in Children and Adolescents With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
United States106 participantsStarted 2024-04-22
Plain-language summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of romosozumab treatment for 12-months compared with bisphosphonate(s) on the number of clinical fractures at 12-months; the number of any fractures at 12-months and change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score at 6-months.
Who can participate
Age range5 Years – 17 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Participant has provided informed consent/assent prior to initiation of any study specific activities/procedures.
OR
* Participant's legally authorized representative has provided informed consent when the participant is legally too young to provide informed consent and the participant has provided written assent based on local regulations and/or guidelines prior to any study-specific activities/procedures being initiated.
* Ambulatory male and female children and adolescents, age 5 to \<18 years, including ambulatory with assistance as defined in the pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) population.
* Clinical diagnosis of OI, defined as clinical history consistent with type I, III, or IV OI as determined by presence of expected phenotype (examples include: facial shape, voice, blue sclera, dentinogenesis imperfecta, typical radiographic features, fracture pattern) and lack of additional features unrelated to type I, III, or IV OI (eg, blindness, mental retardation, neuropathy, and craniosynostosis).
o If familial, also must be autosomal dominant.
* Meets at least one of the following:
* 3 or more fractures within the previous 2 years, or
* 1 or more nonvertebral fracture(s) within the previous 2 years and at least 1 prevalent vertebral fracture, or
* 2 or more prevalent vertebral fractures.
Exclusion Criteria:
Disease Related
* History of an electrophoresis pattern inconsistent with type I, III or IV OI.
* History of known mutation in …
What they're measuring
1
Number of Clinical Fractures
Timeframe: 12 months
2
Number of Any Fractures
Timeframe: 12 months
3
Change from Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD Z-score at 12 Months, as assessed by DXA