This clinical trial aims to compare the performance of CAD/CAM-milled and 3D-printed full-arch implant-supported provisional restorations in patients at the Advanced Implant Prosthetics Clinic of the Complutense University of Madrid, of both sexes, over 18 years of age, edentulous upper, lower or both, whose treatment plan is at least a fixed implant-supported rehabilitation of the complete arch. The main question it aims to answer is if there are differences in the mechanical behavior and optical properties of the materials used as provisional materials in full-arch restorations on implants fabricated by CAD/CAM technology through machining or 3D printing. Participants will: \- Receive milled (control material: PMMA; Multilayer PMMA block, HUGE; Shandong Huge Dental Material Corporation) or printed (test material: 3D impression resin; VarseoSmile Temp, Bego Bremer Goldschägerei Wilh. Herbst GmbH \& Co. KG, Bremen) and they will be in provisional phase for 3 months doing daily life. Researchers will compare PMMA (Multilayer PMMA block, HUGE; Shandong Huge Dental Material Corporation) and the printed-resin (3D impression resin; VarseoSmile Temp, Bego Bremer Goldschägerei Wilh. Herbst GmbH \& Co. KG, Bremen) to see: * Mechanical behavior and the absence of complications, fracture of the structure, material jumping or wear, loosening, or detachment. * Optical properties, initial color, and degradation of the materials used
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Mechanical behavior of 3D-resin and PMMA-milled materials used as provisional materials in full-arch restorations on implants fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
Timeframe: 2 years
Optical properties of 3D-resin and PMMA-milled materials used as provisional materials in full-arch restorations on implants fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
Timeframe: 2 years