Purpose: Domestic violence (DV) is a mental health problem that affects children and adolescents. Widespread evidence suggests that witnessing DV has physical and mental health consequences. 19% of children and adolescents cared for in Children, and Youth Mental Health Centers in Catalonia declare having witnessed DV between their parents. However, there are low specialized therapeutic tools to intervene effectively. In this line, the research team of the current project adapted and manualized a group treatment designed to treat children and adolescents between 8 and 16 years old witnesses of DV on an outpatient basis called: 'Manual of Emotional Regulation and Interpersonal Abilities group Therapy - MERITA'. The treatment main aim is to improve the emotional regulation and interpersonal skills of children and adolescents who have witnessed DV. We carried out a pilot study of MERITA (Lacasa et al., 2016) where we obtained promising results. Now, we want to carry out this study to improve methodological limitations by increasing the sample size. We have added a waiting list for assigning patients in different arms (MERITA intervention vs. treatment as usual as control group), as well as we improved the assessment (pre, post, and follow-ups) using several scales with good psychometric properties. Aims: The aim of this trial is twofold: firstly, to assess the effectiveness of Emotional Regulation and Interpersonal Abilities group Therapy (MERITA) in children and adolescents who are witnesses of DV and treated at the Infant and dolescent mental health center (TAU); and secondly, to analyze the differences (MERITA vs only TAU) on traumatic, depressive and anxious symptomatology, emotional dysregulation, interpersonal difficulties, externalizing and internalizing symptoms, somatic complaints, prosocial behavior, attachment, and family functioning. Specifically, MERITA will be compared to TAU alone (post and 3-month follow-up). Methods Design: Trail with two arms: 1. MERITA + TAU (intervention group) 2. TAU (control group) Sample: The necessary sample size to detect statistically significant differences between the groups has been calculated using the G\*Power: with a minimum effect size (0.50), a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%. A minimum of 36 participants would be required.
Age range
8 Years – 16 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Post-traumatic symptoms
Timeframe: Baseline
Post-traumatic symptoms
Timeframe: Immediately after the intervention
Post-traumatic symptoms
Timeframe: 3-month follow-up
Post-traumatic symptoms
Timeframe: 6-month follow-up
Post-traumatic symptoms
Timeframe: 12-month follow-up
Anxiety symptoms
Timeframe: Baseline
Anxiety symptoms
Timeframe: Immediately after the intervention
Anxiety symptoms
Timeframe: 3-month follow-up
Anxiety symptoms
Timeframe: 6-month follow-up
Anxiety symptoms
Timeframe: 12-month follow-up
Depressive symptoms
Timeframe: Baseline
Depressive symptoms
Timeframe: Immediately after the intervention
Depressive symptoms
Timeframe: 3-month follow-up
Depressive symptoms
Timeframe: 6-month follow-up
Depressive symptoms
Timeframe: 12-month follow-up
Emotional dysegulation
Timeframe: Baseline
Emotional dysegulation
Timeframe: Immediately after the intervention
Emotional dysegulation
Timeframe: 3-month follow-up
Emotional dysegulation
Timeframe: 6-month follow-up
Emotional dysegulation
Timeframe: 12-month follow-up
Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges
Timeframe: Baseline
Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges
Timeframe: Immediately after the intervention
Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges
Timeframe: 3-month follow-up
Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges
Timeframe: 6-month follow-up
Internalizing and externalizing symptoms, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal challenges
Timeframe: 12-month follow-up