The goal of this observational study is to compare clinical utility between Remote EEG Monitoring (REMI) and conventional EEG in patients (6 and older) that are undergoing EEG recording in a hospital as part of their routine clinical care. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * What is the concurrence of diagnosis made by epileptologist using REMI and full-EEG signals. * What is the proportion of participants experiencing as seizure at the time of sensor placement, compared between REMI sensor placement and full-EEG placement. Participants will wear REMI and conventional EEG electrodes at the same time.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Comparison of clinician's diagnostic impression between REMI and conventional electroencephalograph data.
Timeframe: Through the length of time that a patient is actively monitored using both REMI and a full electroencephalograph (up to 24 hours).