Sarcopenic obesity (SO) has synergistic detrimental effects on elderlies' health. It greatly increases the risk of cardio-metabolic diseases, physical impairment, institutionalization, and mortality when compared with sarcopenia or obesity alone. Effective interventions to simultaneously increase muscle mass and decrease fat mass are challenging but highly warranted. Research showed that exercise tends to produce better outcomes in SO than nutritional interventions. Inconsistent effects of nutritional interventions may be due to a short intervention duration and participants' poor compliance with nutritional advice. Participants' adherence to a dietary regimen is essential to the success of nutritional interventions. Behavior change techniques grounded in a tested effective theoretical model - the Health Action Process Approach \[HAPA\] model at improving participants' self-efficacy should be incorporated in a diet modification intervention.This project aims to investigate the effects of a HAPA-based individualized dietary behavior change (IDBC) intervention and exercise training, in combination and separately, for elderly with SO, to improve their body composition and physical functions. In this four-armed randomized controlled trial, investigators will recruit and randomize 380 elderly with SO to one of the following four groups: the combined (COMB) group, receiving the 24-week combined intervention consisting of the IDBC program and exercise training, the EXER-only group, receiving only the exercise training, the IDBC-only group, receiving a combination of the IDBC program and health talks, and the control group, receiving only health talks with no other intervention. Investigators will use health talks to control the group and social interaction effects of the group exercise training for the COMB and the EXER-only groups. Investigators hypothesize that participants in the COMB, EXER-only, and IDBC-only groups will have significantly better outcome measures middle of the intervention (T1), immediately (T2), at 3-months (T3), and 6-months (T4) post-intervention than those in the control group when compared to baseline (T0). Investigators will use mixed-effects modeling to compare changes in all outcome variables at the three post-tests among the four groups. If our intervention is effective at mitigating or preventing such occurrences, the impact on public health will be significant. A similar intervention for other populations.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Changes of muscle strength
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 weeks in the middle of the intervention, 24 weeks after the intervention, 3 months and 6 months after the programme
Changes of muscle mass
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 weeks in the middle of the intervention, 24 weeks after the intervention, 3 months and 6 months after the programme
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scale
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 weeks in the middle of the intervention, 24 weeks after the intervention, 3 months and 6 months after the programme
Changes of body mass index
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 weeks in the middle of the intervention, 24 weeks after the intervention, 3 months and 6 months after the programme
Waist circumference
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 weeks in the middle of the intervention, 24 weeks after the intervention, 3 months and 6 months after the programme
Changes of fat mass
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 weeks in the middle of the intervention, 24 weeks after the intervention, 3 months and 6 months after the programme