UnknownNot Applicable

Project Relate: Romantic Relationship Competence SSI

500 participantsStarted 2023-02

Plain-language summary

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased social isolation and depressive symptoms in youth, adding strain to an already overwhelmed mental healthcare system. Online single-session interventions are digital programs that can help expand access to care and teach evidence-based skills. To help youth build healthy relationships, we developed 3 online single-session interventions (SSI) to teach romantic competence skills to adolescents and emerging adults. Youth, ages 16-20, will be recruited to social media and randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the intervention condition, offering them three SSIs to select from, or an information-only control group. Within the intervention condition, youth will complete one of three romantic competence SSIs: (1) Insight, targeting awareness of one's needs in relationships, (2) Communication, teaching listening and communication skills, and (3) Stay vs. Go, helping youth make difficult decisions. Investigators will assess each SSI's relative benefits on relationship knowledge and depressive symptoms up to three months later compared to the information-only control group. Results will reveal if online SSIs can teach romantic competence skills and if engaging in these interventions has psychosocial benefits for youth with elevated depressive symptoms.

Who can participate

Age range

16 Years – 20 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * are fluent in English * have consistent internet and computer/laptop/smartphone access * report elevated depressive symptoms (a score of \>2 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 item version \[PHQ-2\]) Exclusion Criteria: * fail to meet the above-listed inclusion criteria * exit the study prior to condition randomization * respond with either copy/pasted responses from text earlier in the intervention to any of free response questions * obvious lack of English fluency in open response questions * responding with random text in open response questions * duplicate responses from the same individual in baseline or follow-up surveys

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Kroenke et al., 2001)

Timeframe: Pre-SSI to 3-month follow-up

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05722574

SponsorStony Brook University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-07

Contact for this trial

Jessica Schleider, PhD

(631) 632-4131 jessica.schleider@stonybrook.edu

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Relational Problems trials