The goal of this clinical trial is to give an answer to the question of whether an automated calculation of voided volumes would produce a more accurate set of bladder diary data when compared to the traditional ''eye-balling'' method of estimated voided volumes of paper bladder diaries, in female adult patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: * Does an automated measurement of voided volumes improve the accuracy of bladder diary data? * Does an automated measurement of voided volumes improve the utility of bladder diaries? Participants will be asked to: * void in the disposable measuring jug and record their estimated voided volume for a total of three consecutive days in a paper diary (as per usual care). * transfer their voided volume from the disposable jug to the automated vessel (diary pod) after each void for the same three consecutive days. The reports generated from the paper diaries (estimated volumes) will be compared to the reports generated from the electronic automated measurement of voided volumes to understand whether there is a clinically significant difference between the two. The investigators aim to recruit healthy female adult volunteers with no lower urinary tract symptoms to understand the normal voiding patterns and volumes of adult females using the diary pod. The investigators will also recruit adult females with lower urinary tract symptoms and compare the two methods of capturing the voided volume
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Number of participants with a difference of more than 5% between the estimated recorded voided volumes in milliliters (mL) and the voided volume recorded in milliliters (mL) by the automated device.
Timeframe: After completion of the three day bladder diary ( both paper and electronic version) of all study recruits