CompletedNot Applicable

A Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches to Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures

Egypt24 participantsStarted 2022-08-26

Plain-language summary

The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial, following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. The study is intended to compare between the subtarsal approach, conventional transconjuctival approach and the Y- modification of the transconjuctival approach in the management of zygomatico-maxillay complex fracture.

Who can participate

Age range

20 Years – 50 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with ZMC fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation. * Adult patients aged between 20 and 50 years with no gender predilection. Exclusion Criteria: * An existing laceration in the inferior and lateral periorbital site. * Infection at the fracture line. * Comminuted fracture with bone loss. * Acute and chronic conjunctival diseases.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

accessibility to the fracture site

Timeframe: intraoperative

esthetic appearance and scarring

Timeframe: 6 weeks postoperative

radiographic verification of adequacy of fracture reduction

Timeframe: immediate postoperative

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05695872

SponsorUniversity of Alexandria

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-02-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Zygomatic Fractures trials