This was an exploratory Phase I, randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled, dose-escalation trial to evaluate four dose levels (DLs) of BNT162b4 given in combination with BNT162b2 Bivalent (original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) to select a safe and tolerable dose and to evaluate BNT162b4 + BNT162b2 Bivalent (original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) when given as Dose 1 and Dose 2 (booster) in Cohorts 1 and 2 and BNT162b4 + BNT162b2 Monovalent (OMI XBB.1.5) when given as Dose 2 (booster) in Cohorts 3a, 3b, 4a, and 4b, and 30 microgram (mcg) BNT162b4 when given alone as Dose 1 and Dose 2 in Cohort 5. The trial used a staggered dosing process schema, i.e., enrollment into the next higher dose level was done sequentially and subject to safety data from the previous dose levels, with sentinel participants in Cohorts 1, 2, 3a, and 4a. Cohort 3b investigating the same dose level as cohort 3a but in participants aged \>55 years was opened after safety data for participants aged 18-55 years in Cohort 3a had been reviewed. Enrollment into Cohorts 4a and 4b was opened after safety data for Cohort 3a and 3b had been reviewed. Cohort 5 participants were not randomized and received two doses of BNT162b4 alone after which a safety review was performed after all participants received Dose 2 in this cohort. BNT162b4 plus BNT162b2 Bivalent (original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5)/Monovalent (OMI XBB.1.5) was co-administered (as a single injection). BNT162b4 alone was administered as a single injection.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Number of Participants With Solicited Local Reactions- Post Dose 1
Timeframe: Up to 7 days post-dose1
Number of Participants With Solicited Local Reactions- Post Dose 2
Timeframe: Up to 7 days post-dose 2
Number of Participants With Solicited Systemic Events- Post Dose 1
Timeframe: Up to 7 days post-dose 1
Number of Participants With Solicited Systemic Events- Post Dose 2
Timeframe: Up to 7 days post-dose 2
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)-Post Dose 1
Timeframe: Up to 28 days post-dose 1
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)-Post Dose 2
Timeframe: Up to 28 days post-dose 2
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)-Post Dose 1
Timeframe: Up to 6 to 7 months post-dose 1 for Cohorts 1 to 4 and Comparator Cohorts; and up to 2 months post-dose 1 for Cohort 5
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)-Post Dose 2
Timeframe: Up to 6 to 7 months post-dose 2 for Cohorts 2 to 4; and up to 3 months post-dose 2 for Cohort 5
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters-Post Dose 1
Timeframe: At Day 3 post-Dose 1; at Day 7 post-dose 1
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters-Post Dose 2
Timeframe: At Day 7 post-dose 2
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Clinical Chemistry-Post Dose 1
Timeframe: At Day 3 post-Dose 1; at Day 7 post-dose 1
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Clinical Chemistry-Post Dose 2
Timeframe: At Day 7 post-dose 2
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant New Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities -Post Dose 1
Timeframe: At Day 3 post-Dose 1; at Day 7 post-dose 1
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant New ECG Abnormalities -Post Dose 2
Timeframe: At Day 7 post-dose 2
Number of Participants With Shift of Laboratory Parameters (Hematology) From Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade >=3: Post-dose 1
Timeframe: At Day 3 post-dose 1; at Day 7 post-dose 1
Number of Participants With Shift of Laboratory Parameters (Hematology) From Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade >=3: Post Dose 2
Timeframe: At Day 7 post-dose 2
Number of Participants With Shift of Laboratory Parameters (Clinical Chemistry) From Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade >=3: Post Dose 1
Timeframe: At Day 3 post-dose 1; at Day 7 post-dose 1
Number of Participants With Shift of Laboratory Parameters (Clinical Chemistry) From Baseline Grade 0 to Worst Grade >=3: Post-dose 2
Timeframe: At Day 7 post-dose 2