CompletedNot Applicable

Evaluation of Implant-prosthetic Rehabilitation Performed With Two Implants With Different Surface Characteristics

Italy40 participantsStarted 2022-04-22

Plain-language summary

In this case-control study a bioactive implant surface was compared with traditional surfaced implants. Primary objectives: Test the implant stability in post-extractive sites, comparing traditional surfaced implants (MultiNeO CS, control group) to bioactive surfaced implants (NINA- MultiNeO NH, treatment group). Primary outcome endpoints were Implant stability, assessed through Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values and Marginal bone loss (MBL)

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 80 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

✓. Patient with type 1-2 post extraction sites
✓. Subject is 30-80 years old
✓. Patient ASA 1 or 2
✓. Patients with healthy periodontal conditions (Treated periodontitis, PI\<25%, BoP\<25%)
✓. Patients that are willing to sign an informed consent and participate in a clinical study

Exclusion criteria

✕. Absence Type 1-2 post extraction sites
✕. Patient ASA 3 or 4
✕. Untreated Periodontitis
✕. Any sites where an implant already failed sites
✕. Allergy declared to one or more medicaments to be used during treatment
✕. Pregnancy (confirmed by verbal inquiry)

What they're measuring

Marginal bone loss

Timeframe: 6 months after implant placement

Marginal bone loss

Timeframe: 12 months after implant placement

Implant stability

Timeframe: immediately after implant placement

Implant stability

Timeframe: 30 days after implant placement

Implant stability

Timeframe: 45 days after implant placement

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05495867

SponsorLuigi Canullo

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-09-15

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Missing Teeth trials