Radial Versus Femoral Access For Carotid Artery Stenting (NCT05416853) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active ā Not RecruitingNot Applicable
Radial Versus Femoral Access For Carotid Artery Stenting
China3,000 participantsStarted 2022-07-04
Plain-language summary
Background: For moderate to severe carotid artery atherosclerotic stenosis, in the past decades, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. The transfemoral artery (TFA) using Seldinger's technique has been the most commonly used approach for CAS. The radial artery is an ideal puncture site for cerebrovascular intervention. Studies have shown that nerve intervention through radial artery approach can complete most cerebrovascular intervention procedures, including cerebral angiography, carotid artery stent implantation, vertebral artery stent implantation, intracranial artery stent implantation, mechanical thrombectomy, aspiration, intra-arterial thrombolysis and so on. However, the current studies are based on single center small sample studies, and there has been still a lack of large sample randomized controlled experiments to verify the safety and effectiveness of CAS in transradial artery (TRA) .
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAS via TRA in patients with carotid artery stenosis through a multicenter, prospective and randomized study.
Study design: This study is a randomized, open label, multicenter, parallel controlled trial. A non-inferiority test is performed to compare the primary end point between the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group will undergo carotid stent implantation via radial artery approach, while the control group will use femoral artery approach.
Study population: Adult patients with symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis ā„50% or asymptomatic stenosis ā„70%.
Study outcomes: Primary end points: The incidence of death, or new-onset stroke, or myocardial infarction, or severe hemorrhage events within 30 days post-procedure Secondary end points:1.The incidence of death, or new-onset stroke, or myocardial infarction, or severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours post-procedure. 2. The incidence of death, new-onset stroke and myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 3. The incidence of death within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 4. The incidence of new-onset stroke within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 5. The incidence of myocardial infarction within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. 6. The incidence of severe hemorrhage events within 48 hours / 30 days post-procedure. Other end points: 1. Successful rate of cerebral angiography. 2. Successful rate of CAS. 3. Degree of patient-reported comfort. 4. Operation time. 5. NIHSS score changes within 5-7 days post-procedure. 6. mRS score score within 30 days post-procedure. Safety outcomes: 1.Occurrence of all adverse events. 2. AEs related to operation and device. 3. Incidence of adverse event of special interest.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
ā. Symptomatic stenosis: patients had a transient ischemic attack (TIA), amaurosis, or minor nondisabling stroke involving the target carotid artery within 180 days before randomization.
ā. Asymptomatic stenosis: The results of medical history, physical examination and neurological examination do not suggest ischemic symptoms in the target carotid artery. If artery stenosis degree reache the standard, but there are any one or more of the following symptoms including: non-carotid artery symptoms; contralateral carotid artery symptoms; time from symptom to randomization more than 180 days; and vertebrobasilar artery symptoms. In these situations, patients are considered to be asymptomatic.
ā. Pulsation is palpable in the radial and femoral arteries, and the radial artery must meet any of the following criteria: Allen test or Barbeau test suggesting that ulnar artery collateral circulation is good, or preoperative ultrasound confirming that the radial artery and ulnar artery are well developed.
ā. No family planning within half one year after informed consent signed, or negative pregnancy test for women with childbearing potential.
ā. Patients or their guardians can understand the study purpose, voluntarily participate in the trial, sign informed consent, and complete follow-up visits.
ā. Lesions located in the internal carotid artery, with or without involvement of the adjacent common carotid artery (CCA).
What they're measuring
1
The incidence of death, or new-onset stroke, or myocardial infarction, or severe hemorrhage events within 30 days post-procedure
Timeframe: 30 days
Trial details
NCT IDNCT05416853
SponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China
. For symptomatic patients, at least one of the following conditions should be met: stenosis of 70% or more on ultrasonography; 70% or more on computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); 50% or more on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) according to NASCET standard.
ā. For asymptomatic patients, at least one of the following conditions should be met: stenosis of 70% or more on ultrasonography; 80% or more on CTA or MRA; 60% or more on DSA according to NASCET standard.
Exclusion criteria
ā. Progressive stroke.
ā. Allergic to drugs associated with carotid artery stenting, such as lidocaine, aspirin, clopidogrel, etc.
ā. Allergic to contrast media or interventional device.
ā. Any active hemorrhage, severe anemia, coagulation disorders, or unnecessary blood transfusion treatment. Meet at least one of the following laboratory tests: hemoglobin \< 10g/dL, or platelet count \< 100000 /Ī¼ L, or unadjusted INR \>1.5, or PT beyond upper limit of normal for 1 minute, or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
ā. Previous ipsilateral large cerebral infarction stroke with sequelae, which can affect the judgment of the study end point.
ā. Severe cognitive disorder, unable to cooperate with treatment or postoperative evaluation.
ā. A new-onset stroke occurred 7 days prior to informed consent signed, which has a high hemorrhagic transformation risk after preoperative imaging evaluation.