CompletedNot Applicable

Understanding Individual Differences in Working Memory Training and Transfer in Older Adults

United States313 participantsStarted 2022-03-17

Plain-language summary

The present study investigates how individual differences in cognitive processing contribute to the efficacy of working memory training programs in an older adult population. In a randomized crossover design, different types of working memory training interventions will be evaluated within the same participants. Adding game-like elements to working memory training programs can increase motivation and engagement, which can increase learning. However this process, termed gamification, adds sensory complexity that can lead to increased mental load and/or distraction in older adults. Investigators hypothesize that gamification of training tasks will be beneficial to some and counterproductive to other participants. The investigators will test two models; the first assumes that participants with difficulty inhibiting distracting information will show better learning and transfer when assigned to non-gamified training, whereas those with more distractor tolerance will show better learning and transfer when assigned to gamified training. The second model states that the outcomes of the intervention will be better predicted by performance on measures of general cognitive ability. In a separate study, the investigators will compare working memory training that contains rich, multisensory information with a training program that contains only visual information. Here they will also test two models; the first assumes that participants with difficulty binding two stimulus streams will show better learning and transfer when assigned to visual-only working memory training, whereas participants who do not have this difficulty will show better learning and transfer when assigned to multisensory working memory training. The second model states that the outcomes of the intervention will be better predicted by performance on measures of general cognitive ability.

Who can participate

Age range50 Years – 85 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * 50-85 years of age * Able to understand and speak English and follow study procedures * Does not have a psychological or neurological condition that would prevent being able to give consent to participate * Not currently involved in any other cognitive or memory training studies Exclusion Criteria: * Formal diagnosis of dementia or other neurological disease, including Mild cognitive impairment. * A final total score below 17 on Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Blind (telephone) version. * Score of 10 or more on the Generalized Anxiety Questionnaire (GAD7; Spitzer et al., 2006, Archives of Internal Medicine), indicating presence of moderate or severe anxiety * Score of 9 or more on Geriatric depression scale (GDS15; Yesavage et al., 1982) indicating presence of moderate or severe depression * Abnormal visual acuity prohibitive of tablet-based training. * Physical handicap (motor or perceptual) that would impede training procedures. * Medical illness requiring treatment and/or significant absences during the study timeline. * Current evidence or 2-yr history of seizures, focal brain lesion, or head injury with loss of consciousness. * Current alcohol consumption exceeds 14 drinks per week. * Self-reported illicit drug use.

What they're measuring

Change in N-level

Timeframe: Day 24, Day 46, Day 78

Change in Corsi span

Timeframe: Day 25, Day 47, Day 79

Change in Inhibitory Control Composite Score

Timeframe: Day 24, Day 46, Day 78

Change in Everyday Memory Questionnaire Revised

Timeframe: Day 24, Day 46, Day 77

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05396586

SponsorNortheastern University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2025-03-05