CompletedNot Applicable

Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques Used for Maxillary Hybrid Prosthesis

Egypt12 participantsStarted 2021-03-01

Plain-language summary

evaluation and comparison of the accuracy of conventional and digital impression for full arch screw retained prosthesis for edentulous maxilla.

Age range50 Years – 65 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

✓. Completely edentulous maxillary and mandibular ridges
✓. Healthy ridge covered by normal oral mucosa and free from any ridge flabbiness.
✓. All of the patients were dissatisfied with the retention and stability of their maxillary conventional dentures and expressed a strong desire for a more stable prosthesis.
✓. Sufficient bone quantity and quality in the front and posterior maxillary regions, as determined by preoperative CBCT, to accommodate six implants with a diameter of at least 3.5 mm and a length of at least 10 mm.
✓. Enough restorative space (from the mucosa covering the crest of the maxillary residual ridge to the occlusal plane) to allow the fixed prosthesis to be constructed ,preliminary jaw relationship revealed this.
✓. It's been at least a year since the last extraction.

✕. Systemic diseases that may alter tissue response to implantation and affects osseointegration (radiation, diabetes, osteoporosis, bleeding disorders or hepatic patients)
✕. Long term immunosuppressive and corticosteroid drug therapy.
✕. Patient with abnormal habits as clenching and bruxism.
✕. Smoking patients.
✕. Patients with problems in TMJ.
✕. Neuromuscular diseases.

accuracy of impression technique

Timeframe: immediately after the intervention/procedure

NCT IDNCT05321589

SponsorMansoura University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2022-02-20

Who can participate

Age range50 Years – 65 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

✓. Completely edentulous maxillary and mandibular ridges
✓. Healthy ridge covered by normal oral mucosa and free from any ridge flabbiness.
✓. All of the patients were dissatisfied with the retention and stability of their maxillary conventional dentures and expressed a strong desire for a more stable prosthesis.
✓. Sufficient bone quantity and quality in the front and posterior maxillary regions, as determined by preoperative CBCT, to accommodate six implants with a diameter of at least 3.5 mm and a length of at least 10 mm.
✓. Enough restorative space (from the mucosa covering the crest of the maxillary residual ridge to the occlusal plane) to allow the fixed prosthesis to be constructed ,preliminary jaw relationship revealed this.
✓. It's been at least a year since the last extraction.

✕. Systemic diseases that may alter tissue response to implantation and affects osseointegration (radiation, diabetes, osteoporosis, bleeding disorders or hepatic patients)
✕. Long term immunosuppressive and corticosteroid drug therapy.
✕. Patient with abnormal habits as clenching and bruxism.
✕. Smoking patients.
✕. Patients with problems in TMJ.
✕. Neuromuscular diseases.