The purpose of this first-time-in-human (FTiH) study is to evaluate the reactogenicity, safety, immune response, and efficacy of an investigational herpes simplex virus (HSV)-targeted immunotherapy (TI). The study will be conducted in 2 parts: Part I assessing different formulations of the Herpes Simplex Virus-targeted immunotherapy (HSVTI) in healthy participants aged 18-40 years; Part II assessing the 2 formulations of the HSVTI in participants aged 18-60 years with recurrent genital herpes.
Age range
18 Years – 60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Percentage of participants reporting each solicited administration site event
Timeframe: Within 7 days after the first study intervention dose (administered at Day 1)
Percentage of participants reporting each solicited administration site event
Timeframe: Within 7 days after the second study intervention dose (administered at Day 29)
Percentage of participants reporting each solicited systemic event
Timeframe: Within 7 days after the first study intervention dose (administered at Day 1)
Percentage of participants reporting each solicited systemic event
Timeframe: Within 7 days after the second study intervention dose (administered at Day 29)
Percentage of participants reporting unsolicited adverse events (AEs)
Timeframe: Within 28 days after the first study intervention dose (administered at Day 1)
Percentage of participants reporting unsolicited adverse events (AEs)
Timeframe: Within 28 days after the second study intervention dose (administered at Day 29)
Percentage of participants reporting medically attended events (MAEs)
Timeframe: From Dose 1 (Day 1) up 12 months after last study intervention administration (Day 394)
Percentage of participants reporting any serious adverse events (SAEs)
Timeframe: From Dose 1 (Day 1) up to 12 months after last study intervention administration (Day 394)
Percentage of participants reporting any potential immune-mediated disease (pIMDs) (classified as newly diagnosed or exacerbation of pre-existing events)
Timeframe: From Dose 1 (Day 1) up to 12 months after last study intervention administration (Day 394)
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at pre-study intervention administration (Day 1) in Part I of the study
Timeframe: At pre-study intervention administration (Day 1)
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at Day 8 in Part I of the study
Timeframe: At Day 8
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at Day 29 in Part I of the study
Timeframe: At Day 29
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at Day 36 in Part I of the study
Timeframe: At Day 36
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at Day 64 in Part I of the study
Timeframe: At Day 64
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at pre-study intervention administration (Day 1) in Part II of the study
Timeframe: At pre-study intervention administration (Day 1)
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at Day 8 in Part II of the study
Timeframe: At Day 8
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at Day 29 in part II of the study
Timeframe: At Day 29
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at Day 36 in Part II of the study
Timeframe: At Day 36
Percentage of participants reporting any haematological and biochemical laboratory abnormalities at Day 57 in Part II of the study
Timeframe: At Day 57
Time-to-first confirmed HSV-2 RGH episode in Part II of the study
Timeframe: 14 days post-Dose 2 (Day 43) to end of RGH event reporting period