Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial (DETECT) I is a multi-center, outcome assessor-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial randomizing 160 patients in a 2x2 factorial design. The purpose of this study is to determine differences in visual outcomes between two types of corneal transplant surgeries, ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), and to determine the effect of rho-kinase inhibitors on endothelial cell loss.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Dysfunctional endothelium from Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) with guttata extending beyond 4.5 mm of the central cornea or severe edema without visualization of guttata
* Dysfunctional endothelium from Pseudophakic Corneal Edema (PCE) or Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome (ICE) or other primary endothelial dysfunction such as Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy (PPMD)
* Dysfunctional endothelium from prior graft failure after PKP or EK
* Controlled uveitis (defined as quiet for \> 3 months off of topical steroids with or without systemic immunosuppression) or no uveitis
* Controlled glaucoma with topical medications and/or prior trabeculectomy or tube shunt without ongoing hypotony (IOP \< 5 mmHg) or no glaucoma
* Good candidate for corneal transplantation for either DMEK or UT-DSAEK
* Willingness to participate
* Age greater than 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
* Aphakia, or anterior chamber IOL or scleral fixated IOL in study eye prior to or anticipated during EK
* Pre-operative central sub-epithelial or stromal scarring that the investigator believes is visually significant and could impact post-operative stromal clarity assessment
* Peripheral anterior synechiae (iris to angle) in the angle greater than a total of three clock hours
* Visually significant optic nerve (ok to have small visual field defects) or macular severe pathology
* Pregnancy
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.