Comparative Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of GNR-069 and Nplate in Patients With ITP (NCT05220878) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
Comparative Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of GNR-069 and Nplate in Patients With ITP
Russia160 participantsStarted 2021-09-09
Plain-language summary
It is a phase III multicenter randomized double-blinded comparative study of clinical efficacy and safety of GNR-069 and Nplate in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Written Informed Consent Form to participate in the study;
. Men and women aged 18-75 years inclusive at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form;
. Documented diagnosis of ITP with a disease duration of more than 12 months from the moment of confirmation of the diagnosis by bone marrow aspirate or biopsy results;
. A. For patients who have not had splenectomy:
. Thrombocytopenia ≥30.0 x 109/L - \<50.0 x 109/L with severe hemorrhagic syndrome or thrombocytopenia \<30.0 x 109/l, regardless of the presence of hemorrhagic syndrome, according to the results of platelet count conducted in a local laboratory for 7 days before the start of therapy with investigational or reference drug;
. Patients receiving GCs, azathioprine and danazole should receive these drugs in a maintenance dose for at least 4 weeks before starting therapy with investigational or reference drug;
. Consent of study participants with preserved childbearing function to use reliable methods of contraception (a combination of at least two methods, including 1 barrier method, for example, the use of a condom and spermicide) from the moment of signing the Informed Consent Form and 3 months after the last administration of investigational or reference drug.
Exclusion criteria
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Proportion of patients achieving sustained response to treatment