Imaginal exposure is a widely used and effective psychological treatment technique. Recent research suggests that neural activations and emotional responses during imaginal exposure are similar to those elicited during in vivo exposure. However, to the investigators knowledge, no direct comparison between in vivo and imaginal exposure has been performed during neuroimaging. This study compares neural activations and emotional responses during imaginal and in vivo exposure. This study also explores the generalizability of fear reduction achieved through imaginal exposure to fear responses elicited by in vivo stimuli, and vice versa, in a follow-up session approximately one week later. A better understanding of the mechanisms behind both types of exposure could have significant clinical utility, as well as elucidate the differences between fear created from outward stimuli and fear created from inward stimuli, such as mental imagery.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Blood oxygen level dependent contrast (BOLD-signal) during exposure to fearful stimuli (in vivo or imaginal).
Timeframe: Day 1
Physiological arousal response during exposure (in vivo or imaginal).
Timeframe: Day 1
Physiological arousal response during follow-up exposure
Timeframe: One week after Day 1
Ratings of subjective fear experienced during exposure to fearful stimuli and neutral stimuli
Timeframe: Day1
Ratings of subjective fear experienced during exposure to fearful stimuli and neutral stimuli
Timeframe: One week after Day 1