This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare cancer control and health-related quality of life following pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy versus standard radical prostatectomy. The investigators hypothesize that pelvic fascia-sparing radical prostatectomy will have similar cancer control (primary outcome) and sexual function outcomes; and significantly better urinary function, penile shortening/deformity and inguinal hernia risks as compared to radical prostatectomy.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Surgical Margin Status as assessed by surgical pathology results
Timeframe: 1 week post-surgery
Biochemical Recurrence as assessed by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
Timeframe: 6 months post-surgery
Biochemical Recurrence as assessed by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
Timeframe: 12 months post-surgery
Biochemical Recurrence as assessed by Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
Timeframe: 24 months post-surgery