Primary Objective -To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to omalizumab in reducing the polyp size and improving sense of smell Secondary Objectives * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) symptoms at Week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) at week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving nasal peak inspiratory flow at Week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on CRSwNP overall disease severity at Week 24 compared to omalizumab * To evaluate the safety of dupilumab and omalizumab
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24