UnknownNot Applicable

A Prospective, Single Surgeon, Randomized Control Study Comparing ab Interno XEN Gel Microstent Implantation vs Closed Conjunctiva ab Externo Implantation Performed at the Slit Lamp for the Treatment of Uncontrolled Glaucoma

Canada50 participantsStarted 2021-08-01

Plain-language summary

The objective of the study is to prospectively compare the success rate of ab externo implantation and outcome measures of glaucoma filtering surgery namely IOP (intraocular pressure), number of glaucoma medications, adjunct procedure and adverse events rate compared to the traditional ab interno implantation technique.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

. Patients with maximally tolerated medically treated (MTMT) uncontrolled glaucoma (POAG, PEX G, PDS G)
. Male or female who was in good general health and \>18 years of age at the time of the preoperative exam
. The subject complied with post-operative instructions and made their scheduled office appointments

Exclusion criteria

. Known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to any medications/diagnostic agents (eg, topical anesthetic, dilating drops, fluorescein) required for this protocol or any of the XEN components (eg, porcine products or glutaraldehyde)
. Known history of bleeding disorder or prolonged bleeding after surgery (in the opinion of the investigator) or those on pharmacologic blood thinners other than aspirin (up to 100 mg/day)

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Compared the success of interno / externo implantation

Timeframe: 15 minutes by implantation

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04943185

SponsorInstitut de l'oeil des Laurentides

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-09-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More The Objective of the Study is to Prospectively Compare the Success Rate of ab Externo and Interno Implantation trials