A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, PK, PD and Immunogenicity of Cipaglucosidase Alfa/Miglu… (NCT04808505) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, PK, PD and Immunogenicity of Cipaglucosidase Alfa/Miglustat in IOPD Subjects Aged 0 to <18
United States, Germany, Italy36 participantsStarted 2023-07-18
Plain-language summary
This is a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, PK, PD, and immunogenicity of cipaglucosidase alfa/miglustat treatment in ERT-experienced and ERT-naïve pediatric subjects with IOPD.
Who can participate
Age range
17 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Male or female subjects who are aged 6 months to \< 18 years on Day 1
. Subject must have documentation of IOPD genotype
. Subject must have had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at the time of diagnosis
. Subject must have received ERT for at least 6 months immediately before enrollment. For subjects whose ERT dosage has been modified, the subject must have been on the modified dosage and regimen for at least 3 months before enrollment
. Subjects aged ≥ 12 to \< 18 years must perform one valid 6-minute walk test (6MWT) (≥ 75 meters) at screening; Subjects aged ≥ 5 to \< 12 years must perform one valid 6MWT (≥ 40 meters) at screening; Subjects aged 18 months to \< 5 years must be ambulatory and assessed to be likely to be able to perform 6MWT (≥ 40 meters) when they turn 5 years old
. Subjects must have experienced a clinical decline on their current rhGAA dose and frequency
. Male or female subjects who are aged 0 to \<6 months at Day 1
. Subject must have documentation of IOPD genotype
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Proportion of subjects with infusion-associated reactions (IARs)
. Subject is CRIM negative and has not received prophylactic immunomodulation (Cohort 1); Subject is CRIM negative and will not be receiving prophylactic immunomodulation (Cohort 2)
. Subject has a history of life-threatening IARs/hypersensitivity (eg, anaphylaxis and severe cutaneous reactions) to ERT (eg, alglucosidase alfa, cipaglucosidase alfa, miglustat) or other iminosugars, or to any of the excipients, where rechallenge was unsuccessful
. Subject has prior history of illness or condition known to affect motor function
. Female subject is pregnant (or intends to get pregnant) or breastfeeding at screening (Cohort 1)