A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab 300 mg in Patients With Thyroid Eye Disease (TED) (NCT04737330) | Clinical Trial Compass
TerminatedPhase 3
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab 300 mg in Patients With Thyroid Eye Disease (TED)
Stopped: Analysis of blinded patient data showed a very low probability of the study meeting the primary efficacy endpoints. No safety concerns were identified
Germany28 participantsStarted 2021-11-29
Plain-language summary
Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a rare autoimmune, inflammatory disorder of the orbit and represents the most common extra-thyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease (GD). Several lines of evidence suggest an important role of interleukin-17A (IL-17A) in the pathogenesis of TED; increased levels of IL-17A have been detected in the serum and tears of patients with TED and IL-17A levels correlate with clinical activity of the disease. T-helper 17 cells (Th17 cells) (as well as other cellular sources of IL-17A, e.g., Tc17 cells) have been shown to infiltrate the orbital tissue of affected patients, producing IL-17A. IL-17A stimulates fibroblast activation, leading to retrobulbar tissue expansion and orbital fibrosis, which causes significant functional impairment. Secukinumab is a recombinant high-affinity fully human monoclonal anti-IL-17A antibody currently approved for the treatment of 3 inflammatory/ autoimmune diseases: moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) (ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axSpA). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) in adults with active, moderate to severe TED.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 80 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
* Patient had to be able to understand and communicate with the investigator and comply with the requirements of the study and had to give a written, signed and dated informed consent before any study assessment was performed.
* Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients ≥ 18 years of age.
* Clinical diagnosis of active, moderate to severe TED (not sight-threatening) in the study eye at Baseline associated with 2 or more of the following:
* Lid retraction \>= 2 mm
* Moderate or severe soft tissue involvement
* Exophthalmos \>= 3 mm above normal
* Inconstant or constant diplopia
* Onset of TED symptoms fewer than 12 months prior to Baseline.
* CAS \>= 4 (on a 7-point scale, with a score of \>= 3 indicating active TED) in the more severely affected (study) eye at Screening and Baseline. Note: Proptosis is the primary qualifier for selection of the study eye. In case both eyes showed a similar degree of proptosis, other inflammatory signs and symptoms (CAS) were taken into account by the investigator for the selection of the study eye.
* Peripheral euthyroidism or mild hypo-/hyperthyroidism defined as free T3 (fT3) and free T4 (fT4) \< 30% above/below normal limits at Screening. Every effort was to be made to correct the mild hypo-/hyperthyroidism promptly and to maintain the euthyroid state until the end of this study.
* Orbital MRI assessment available confirming the diagnosis of TED for patients initially presenting with hypo- or eut…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Plan A - Percentage of Participants Achieving Overall Response
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16
2
Plan B - Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in Reduction of Proptosis