Carotid artery disease is a main cause of ischemic stroke and vascular dementia, and a highly prevalent disease. There is uncertainty about the optimal management of patients with serendipitously or systematically detected asymptomatic carotid artery disease, due to the paucity of information on the predictive features of serious vascular events. While percent diameter stenosis is currently the accepted standard to decide about local interventions (carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy), international guidelines also recommend the evaluation of qualitative features of carotid artery disease as a guide to treatment. There is, however, no agreement on which qualitative features are best predictors of events. Furthermore, a role for metabolic plaque profile, local mechanical and hemorheologic factors in triggering microembolization and silent ischemic events has been proposed from experimental studies. This inadequate knowledge leads to a poor ability to identify patients at higher risk and to an unwarranted dispersion of medical resources, lack of standardization in diagnostic methods, and the use of expensive and resource-consuming techniques. Against this background, the investigators aim at: 1. Prospectively identifying the best predictors of (silent and overt) ischemic stroke and vascular dementia in patients with asymptomatic subcritical carotid artery disease, by identifying the non-invasive diagnostic features of the "vulnerable carotid plaque" as a possible guide for optimal - local and systemic - treatment. 2. Transferring new ultrasound techniques possibly improving risk prediction to the clinical field 3. Assess whether "smart", low-cost diagnostic methods, such as ultrasound-based evaluations integrating established and advanced techniques, may yield at least the same level of prospective information as more expensive and less cost-effective techniques.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Number of participants developing TIA/stroke and/or subclinical ischemic lesions
Timeframe: 2 years
Number of participants developing neurocognitive decline
Timeframe: 2 years