The Study investigates a new product, sFilm-FS, aimed to help controlling body fluid leakage in general surgery procedures, proposing its use as an adjunct to hemostasis and/or sealing.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus an Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Surgery Through ...
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through Physical Examinations
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Detection of Antibodies Against Fibrinogen.
Timeframe: Last Follow-Up Visit (Visit 9)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Urine Analysis Values
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)
To Evaluate the Safety of sFilm-FS Versus the Active-comparator (TACHOSIL®) When Used as Adjunct to Conventional Hemostatic Techniques During Elective Hepatic Surgery Through the Count of Participants With Abnormal Blood / Coagulation Parameters Profiles
Timeframe: From visit 1 to visit 9 (an average of 6.5 months)