The aim of the present study is to analyse the feasibility, safety and IH rate using a prophylactic sublay biosynthetic BIO-A (GORE) mesh in order to prevent incisional hernia following midline laparotomy in clean-contaminated and contaminated wounds. The study was designed as a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the running suture alone to the running suture reinforced with biosynthetic mesh (BIOA) in sub lay position.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Rate of Incisional Hernia at Ultrasound examination
Timeframe: 3 months
Rate of Incisional Hernia at Ultrasound examination
Timeframe: 6 months
Rate of Incisional Hernia at Ultrasound examination
Timeframe: 12 months
Rate of Incisional Hernia at Ultrasound examination
Timeframe: 24 months
Rate of Incisional Hernia at Clinical examination
Timeframe: 3 months
Rate of Incisional Hernia at Clinical examination
Timeframe: 6 months
Rate of Incisional Hernia at Clinical examination
Timeframe: 12 months
Rate of Incisional Hernia at Clinical examination
Timeframe: 24 months