Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation at Low Temperature Versus Electrocautery Block Resection at High F⦠(NCT04425265) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation at Low Temperature Versus Electrocautery Block Resection at High Frequency for Localized Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
China500 participantsStarted 2020-06-30
Plain-language summary
This study aims at exploring whether plasma radiofrequency ablation at low temperature is associated with better survival outcome in localized recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma by conducting a randomized controlled trial of plasma radiofrequency ablation at low temperature versus electrocautery block resection at high frequency for localized recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. If the hypothesis is confirmed, it is expected to provide a convenient choice for the surgical treatment of localized recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years β 70 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
β. At least 6 months disease free interval (defined as duration between the initial course of radiotherapy and recurrence)
β. Histopathologically diagnosed with undifferentiated or differentiated, nonkeratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
β. Resectable recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: rT1-3N0-3M0 A) The tumor is confined to the nasopharyngeal mucosa, or the surface of the parapharyngeal space, or the bottom wall of the sphenoid sinus, and is more than 0.5cm away from the internal carotid artery B) The cervical lymph node lesions do not infiltrate the cervical spine, brachial plexus, cervical muscles, and internal carotid artery.
β. Age: 18-70 years old.
β. Subjects must sign an informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
β. Karnofsky score (KPS)β€70.
β. Has known Subjects with other malignant tumors.