Restaurants are normative eating contexts for many families. Restaurant meals tend to be higher in calories and lower in nutritional quality than those prepared at home. Targeting children's food selection in restaurants has the potential to improve diet quality, attenuate excess energy intake, and shape healthy habits. The objective of this study is to make healthier kids' meal options more appealing and easier to choose via an in-restaurant intervention that combines repeated exposure and choice architecture strategies. Six locations of a quick-service restaurant will be paired based on income levels in the surrounding census tracts. A location from each pair will be randomized to each study group (intervention, control). Recruitment and data collection will be conducted across 3 cohorts, with recruitment conducted during a family's regular visit. Study participation will involve 7 more visits to the location where the family was recruited, 6 of which will be during an exposure period of about 2 months. Families in intervention restaurants will receive placemats promoting healthier featured kids' meals. Participating families will also receive a frequent diner card which, after purchasing one of the featured healthier kids' meals across 6 occasions, makes them eligible for a free kids' meal of their choice during a predetermined redemption period. In the control group, generic placemats will be provided, and participating families will be provided with frequent diner cards that can be used for any kids' meals. The aims of this study are: (1) to test effects of a healthier kids' meal intervention on children's meal orders, and (2) to test effects of a healthier kids' meal intervention on children's dietary intake. It is hypothesized that (1a) children in the intervention restaurants will be more likely than controls to select one of the promoted healthier kids' meals at post-test, (1b) children in the intervention group will order fewer calories and desserts and less saturated fat, sodium, and sugar at post-test versus controls, (1c) the promoted healthier meals will make up a greater percentage of kids' meals ordered in intervention restaurants versus controls, based on sales data across the study period, and (2) compared to controls, children in the intervention group will consume fewer calories and less saturated fat, sodium, and sugar in the restaurant at post-test.
Age range
4 Years – 8 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Meal Type Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Change in Meal Type Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Total Calories Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Change in Total Calories Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Total Saturated Fat Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Change in Total Saturated Fat Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Total Sugar Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Change in Total Sugar Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Total Sodium Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Change in Total Sodium Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Dessert Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Change in Dessert Ordered for Child in Restaurant
Timeframe: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)