Heart failure affects over 25 million people worldwide and nearly 7 million adults in the United States alone. Nearly 25% of patients with heart failure have worsened disease burden from dyssynchronous ventricular contraction due to abnormal electrical impulse propagation. These patients may benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) where contraction between the ventricles is coordinated by simultaneous electrical stimulation of the right and left ventricles. In animal models, CRT changes molecular and cellular biology by improving myofilament function, ion channel regulation, beta-receptor signaling, and overall mitochondrial energetics. In randomized clinical outcomes trials, the use of CRT further reduced the incidence of heart failure events and improved overall mortality. However, nearly 75% of patients with heart failure have synchronous ventricular contraction and therefore do not qualify for CRT. CRT profoundly alters underlying molecular and cellular biology as a result of the transition from dyssynchronous to resynchronized contraction, enhancing myocyte function and adrenergic responsiveness. The investigators previously hypothesized CRT-like benefits could be achieved in otherwise synchronous heart failure by purposely inducing dyssynchrony for several hours each day and then reversing this for the remainder of the time. The investigators termed this pacemaker induced transient dyssynchrony, or PITA, and tested its impact in a canine dilated cardiomyopathy model. Following several weeks of rapid atrial pacing to induce heart failure in the animals, the investigators compared implementing 4-weeks of PITA - consisting of dyssynchronous rapid right ventricular pacing for 6 hours each night and atrial pacing for the remaining time - to animals that always received rapid atrial pacing. The fast rate is used to generate a heart failure phenotype. PITA improved chamber dilation, increased beta-adrenergic responsiveness and contractile function, and improved myofiber structure compared to heart failure canine controls. While first tested in an intact conscious translational model, no study has yet investigated PITA in humans. This pilot research protocol tests the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of PITA in humans with dilated cardiomyopathy. The study will leverage pre-existing Medtronic (Mounds View, MN) pacemaker/defibrillators implanted in dilated cardiomyopathy patients based on current clinical guidelines. If successful, this study will allow for a larger, first-in-human study to assess indexes of left ventricular function in dilated cardiomyopathy patients with PITA.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Feasibility as assessed by percent ventricular capture through Holter monitoring
Timeframe: Up to 7 weeks
Safety as assessed by number of arrhythmia episodes via device interrogation
Timeframe: Up to 3 months
Safety as assessed by the number of hospitalizations or ER visits for arrhythmia or heart failure
Timeframe: Up to 3 months
Tolerability as assessed by change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Tolerability as assessed by change in distance during 6-minute walk test
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8
Safety as assessed by number of tachytherapies delivered by ICDs
Timeframe: Up to 3 months
Tolerability as assessed by change in Global Well-Being score on a Visual Analog Scale
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Tolerability as assessed by change in Subjective Dyspnea score on a Visual Analog Scale
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Tolerability as assessed by change in Frailty Index
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12
Tolerability as assessed by change in Sleep Quality
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 5, Week 8 and Week 12