Euphrasia Eye Drops in Preterm Infants With First Signs of Congestion of Nasolacrimal Duct (NCT04122300) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
Euphrasia Eye Drops in Preterm Infants With First Signs of Congestion of Nasolacrimal Duct
Switzerland84 participantsStarted 2011-05-22
Plain-language summary
Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) occurs in approximately 10 to 20% of all term newborns, and is the most common cause of persistent tearing and ocular discharge in children. CNLDO causes symptoms in up to 6% of children during the first year of life. The first clinical signs appear during the first month of life in 95% of cases and usually consist of tearing and debris on the eyelashes ("mattering"). Mucopurulent eye discharge occurs commonly in infants with CNLDO and, in the absence of other signs of infection, suggests bacterial overgrowth in the stagnant tear pool of the lacrimal sac.
This study investigates whether early administration of Euphrasia eye drops (Weleda AG, Arlesheim) in preterm neonates presenting with first ocular discharge with or without tearing and reddened eye fosters the resolution of the ocular discharge and reduces the need for topical antibiotic therapy.
Who can participate
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Preterm neonates (with a gestational age of 24 to 37 weeks)
* Presenting with first signs of a congestion of the nasolacrimal duct, i.e. white, yellow, or green ocular discharge with or without tearing and reddened eye.
* Written informed consent by the parents or legal guardians
Exclusion Criteria:
* Congenital abnormalities of the eye
* Ophtalmia neonatorum
* Severe asphyxia
* Sepsis
* Intracranial bleeding (intraventricular hemorrhage ≥ grade III)
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Number of patients with treatment success at 96 hours