Inflammatory synaptopathy is a prominent pathogenic mechanism in multiple sclerosis (MS) and in its mouse model, which can cause excitotoxic damage by long-lasting excessive synaptic excitation and, consequentially, drives disease progression by leading to motor and cognitive deficits. As synaptopathy occurs early during the disease course and is potentially reversible, it represents an appealing therapeutic target in MS. Although reliable biomarkers of MS synaptopathy are still missing, recent researches highlighted miR-142-3p as a possible candidate. Indeed, miR-142-3p has been described to promote the IL-1beta-dependent synaptopathy by downregulating GLAST/EAAT1, a crucial glial transporter involved in glutamate homeostasis. Furthermore, mir-142-3p has been suggested as a putative negative MS prognostic factor and a target of current MS disease modifying therapies. The hypothesis of this study is that miR-142-3p represents a good biomarker for excitotoxic synaptopathy to predict MS course, and, possibly, treatment efficacy at individual level, including both pharmacological strategies and non-pharmacological interventions, like therapeutic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to ameliorate MS spasticity. To this aim, the role of miR-142-3p in MS synaptopathy, its potential impact on the efficacy of disease-modifying treatments currently used in MS therapy as well as the influence of genetic variants (SNPs) of miR-142-3p and GLAST/EAAT1 coding genes on the responsiveness to therapeutic TMS, will be further investigated in the study. By validating miR-142-3p as potential biomarker of synaptopathy, it is expect to improve MS prognosis and personalized therapies. Patients with MS, who will undergo neurological assessment, conventional brain MRI scan, and CSF and blood withdrawal for diagnostic and clinical reasons at the Neurology Unit of IRCCS INM-Neuromed will be enrolled in the study. Neurophysiological, biochemical and genetic parameters together with lower limb spasticity will be evaluated. Subjects, who will undergo blood sampling and/or lumbar puncture for clinical suspicions, later on not confirmed, will be recruited as control group. A subgroup of MS patients showing lower limb spasticity will be included in a two-week repetitive TMS stimulation protocol (iTBS) to correlate the patient responsiveness to this non-pharmacological treatment with MS-significant SNPs of both miR-142-3p and GLAST/EAAT1 coding genes.
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
CSF concentration of miR-142-3p
Timeframe: T0 (enrollment); MS patients vs Control subjects
CSF concentration of soluble molecules
Timeframe: T0 (enrollment); MS patients vs Control subjects
Clinical disability assessment by Progression Index calculation for correlation analysis with CSF-miR-142-3p levels
Timeframe: Changes from T0 (enrollment) to T12 (12 months), T24 (24 months), T36 (36 months), T48 (48 months), T60 (60 months) and T72 (72 months) of follow-up
Clinical disability assessment by MSFC calculation for correlation analysis with CSF-miR-142-3p levels
Timeframe: Changes from T0 (enrollment) to T12 (12 months), T24 (24 months), T36 (36 months), T48 (48 months), T60 (60 months) and T72 (72 months) of follow-up
Neuroradiological assessment for correlation analysis with CSF-miR-142-3p levels
Timeframe: Changes from T0 (enrollment) to T12 (12 months), T24 (24 months), T36 (36 months), T48 (48 months), T60 (60 months) and T72 (72 months) of follow-up
Neurophysiological assessments for correlation analysis with CSF-miR-142-3p levels
Timeframe: Changes from T0 (enrollment) to T12 (12 months), T24 (24 months), T36 (36 months), T48 (48 months), T60 (60 months) and T72 (72 months) of follow-up
Statistical correlation of miR-142-3p levels in MS CSF with disease and neurophysiological parameters
Timeframe: T0 (enrollment), T12 (12 months), T24 (24 months), T36 (36 months), T48 (48 months), T60 (60 months) and T72 (72 months).