Is Periacetabular Osteotomy Superior to Progressive Resistance Training? (NCT03941171) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Is Periacetabular Osteotomy Superior to Progressive Resistance Training?
Denmark, Norway69 participantsStarted 2019-07-01
Plain-language summary
The primary aim of this study is to examine if Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO) followed by 4 months of usual care followed by 8 months of progressive resistance training (PRT) is superior to 12 months of a PRT intervention in patients with hip dysplasia eligible for PAO in terms of self-reported pain on the HAGOS questionnaire. Secondary aims are to investigate changes in patient-reported symptoms, physical function in daily living, physical function in sport and recreation, hip and/or groin-related quality of life, generic health status, functional performance, muscle strength, physical activity and adverse events between PAO followed by usual care+PRT compared to PRT only. We hypothesise that in patients with hip dysplasia, PAO followed by usual care+PRT, results in significantly less pain at 12 months follow-up, compared to PRT only.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 40 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Patients aged 18-45 years and diagnosed with hip dysplasia referred from primary care to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at one of the two participating hospitals.
✓. Considered eligible for PAO by a surgeon.
✓. Radiographic verified hip dysplasia (CE-angle \<25 degrees and AI-angle \>10 degrees) and clinical symptoms.
✓. Range of motion: internal rotation \>15 degrees, external rotation \>15 degrees, hip flexion \>110 degrees.
✓. Able to commute to training sessions.
Exclusion criteria
✕. OA degree ≥1 on classification of Tönnis'.
✕. CE-angle \<10 degrees.
✕. Previous pelvic surgery for hip dysplasia (affected side).