Background: Scientific evidence appoints that the use of non-invasive positive airway pressure in pleural effusion drainage patients is associated with a reduction in these complications, as well as with other benefits. Objectives: To test the implementation of the best evidence-based practices for the use of non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with chest drainage for pleural effusion, by acceptability, reach, appropriateness, direct costs, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. In addition, to assess the impact of implementing these practices on health-related outcomes of patients having their pleural effusion drained through dwelling time of the chest tube, hospital stay and others relevant outcomes. Methods: quasi-experimental study with pretest-posttest design. Eight hospitals that provide physiotherapeutic care to pleural effusion drainage patients will be involved. The study will be developed in three phases. In phase I, a audit team will help the local research team to elaborate strategies to cope with barriers related to the use of CPAP in patients with pleural effusion and catheter drainage, using a interview with the physical therapist, patient history analysis, and interviews with the patients. In implementation phase, the results obtained from phase I will be presented to physiotherapists to physiotherapists and a discussion will be started on the evidence regarding the best practices in the application of CPAP for educational purposes only. In phase III, new interviews will be held with the physical therapist and patients and the patient histories will be analyzed to assess the impact of the intervention 30 days after implementation phase.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Rate of adherence to treatment by patients and by professionals
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 years
Rate of appropriateness of the treatment according to previous professional training
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 years
Treatment direct costs
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 years
Rate of treatment feasibility
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 years
Penetration of professional training
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 years
Rate of sustainability of professional training
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 years