Stopped: The trial was terminated early following strategic review after emergence of nonclinical data with a non-GlaxoSmithKline asset.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and PK profile of single and repeat ascending doses of GSK3186899 in healthy subjects. This is a Phase 1 first time in human study, to investigate the effect of food on PK of GSK3186899. This study will consists of two parts. Part A (dose escalation phase) will be a single ascending, sequential cross-over design in cohorts 1, 2 and 3 of subjects. Cohort 1 and 2 will be 4-way cross-over which includes 4 dosing regimens of GSK3186899 and placebo (3:1 ratio) under fasted conditions. Cohort 3 will be 2-way cross-over which includes 2 treatment periods, 2 dosing regimens in fasted and fed conditions. In Part B (repeat dose escalation phase) subjects will be randomized to receive repeat doses of either GSK3186899 or placebo (3:1 ratio) in either fed or fasted conditions. Part B will be conducted based on the review of all safety, tolerability and PK data from Part A. The study duration includes screening, treatment periods and follow-up.
Age range
18 Years – 55 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Part A- Cohorts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and SAEs
Timeframe: Up to Week 12
Part A- Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Non-SAEs and SAEs
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part B: Number of Participants With Non-SAEs and SAEs
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part A- Cohorts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 12
Part A- Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part A- Cohorts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 12
Part A- Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part A- Cohorts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Worst-Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Method
Timeframe: Up to Week 12
Part A- Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Worst-Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Method
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst-Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Method
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part A- Cohorts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Timeframe: Up to Week 12
Part A- Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal ECG Findings
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal ECG Findings
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part A- Cohorts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 12
Part A- Cohort 3: Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results by PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Timeframe: Up to Week 9
Part A- Cohorts 1 and 2: Number of Participants With Abnormal Cardiac Telemetry Findings
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours post-dose
Part A- Cohort 3: Number of Participants Abnormal Cardiac Telemetry Findings
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours post-dose
Part B: Number of Participants Abnormal Cardiac Telemetry Findings
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours post-dose