A Clinical Effectiveness Study Examining the Efficacy and Safety of ONS-5010 in Subjects With Neo… (NCT03834753) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
A Clinical Effectiveness Study Examining the Efficacy and Safety of ONS-5010 in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
United States228 participantsStarted 2019-06-25
Plain-language summary
This research study will examine the safety and effectiveness of ONS-5010 in participants with AMD. The goal is to prevent vision loss by evaluating the effectiveness of ONS-5010 as compared with ranibizumab.
Who can participate
Age range
50 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Active primary Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization lesions secondary to Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye
* Best corrected visual acuity of 25-67 letters read (20/50 to 20/320 Snellen equivalent)
* Study eye must:
* Have active leakage on Fluorescein Angiogram involving the fovea
* Have edema involving the fovea
* Be free of scarring, fibrosis, or atrophy involving the central foveal zone
Exclusion Criteria:
* Previous subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation in the study eye
* Laser photocoagulation (juxtafoveal or extrafoveal) in the study eye within 1-month preceding randomization
* Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye that may require medical or surgical intervention or contribute to vision loss within 1 year
* Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye
* Current vitreous haemorrhage in the study eye
* Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in the study eye
* History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye
* Infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye
* Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication)
* Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception
* Current treatment for active systemic infection
* Known allergy to any component of the study drug or history of allergy to fluorescein , not amenable to treatment
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Proportion of subjects who gain 15 or more letters in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)