Comparison of Double-Flap Incision, Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision, and Coronally Advance… (NCT03787342) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Comparison of Double-Flap Incision, Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision, and Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Periosteal Releasing Incision for Flap Advancement
Egypt38 participantsStarted 2016-12-01
Plain-language summary
Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is a reliable method to augment insufficient bone volume for implant placement. Membrane exposure is a major complication which is avoided by tension free primary closure. Classically Periosteal Releasing Incision (PRI) is performed to advance the flap. The aim of this trial is to compare Double Flap Incision (DFI), Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision (MPRI) \& Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap (CALF) to PRI in terms of flap advancement, postoperative pain \& swelling, membrane exposure and the amount of bone gain clinically and radiographically in GBR procedures.
Who can participate
Age range20 Years – 65 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Partially edentulous patients in the mandibular posterior region.
✓. Patients with healthy systemic condition.
✓. Insufficient ridge width (\< 5mm).
✓. Presence of proper inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part.
✓. Adequate soft tissue biotype (≥ 2mm).
✓. No clinical evidence of active periodontal disease or oral infections.
Exclusion criteria
✕. Patients with systemic conditions that may interfere with the results of the study.
✕. Patients with local pathological defects related to the area of interest.
✕. Unmotivated, uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene.
✕. Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as smoking, alcoholism or para-functional habits.