Patients who self-harm are a heterogeneous population. Outpatient treatments structured for borderline personality disorder are often recommended and hospitalization kept to a minimum. However, few studies have focused on the most severe, complex conditions with extreme suicide risk. A recent national investigation from Norway (2017) demonstrated a far larger cohort of extensively hospitalized inpatients with extreme self-harming behaviors than was expected (N=427) - identified in all health regions. Reported challenges were high-risk situations, severe medical sequelae, difficult collaborations across services, and uncertainty about psychiatric diagnoses. Severe, often bizarre, self-harm is thus a major challenge for both patients and health services. In hospitals, safety measures can involve restrictions and involuntary regimes. As research on this target population is sparse, the current project seeks further understanding of complex conditions - psychopathology, treatment experiences and service collaboration. The project is a national, multi-center cooperation including patients in psychiatric hospitals in all health regions. It is cross sectional. Data is based on diagnostic interviews, patients' self-reported symptoms and both patients and service providers treatment experiences. The inclusion period for inpatients (N=300) and a comparison sample of outpatients (N=300) is one year. The target group is inpatients with extreme hospitalization and severe self-mutilation. A comparison group is patients with personality pathology attending outpatient treatments. Recruitment is across health regions. Aim 1: Investigate psychopathology of patients in the target population and compare to a clinical sample admitted to outpatient treatment Aim 2: Investigate personality functioning in the target population and compare to a clinical sample admitted to outpatient treatment Aim 3: a) Investigate health service use in the target population and compare to a clinical sample admitted to outpatient treatment. b) Investigate treatment experiences and health service collaborations in the target population. The project will provide rational for future preventive treatment interventions
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Psychiatric Disorders as assessed by M.I.N.I.plus
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder as assessed by PTSD CL 5
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Severity of psychiatric symptoms as assessed by PHQ
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Screening for substance use disorder as assessed by AUDIT/DUDIT
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Personality Disorders as assessed by SCID 5 PD
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Psychosocial functioning I as assessed by GAF
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Psychosocial functioning II as assessed by WSAS
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Learning disability screening as assessed by HASI
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Autism spectrum screening as assessed by RAADS-R
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Overall personality functioning as assessed by SIPP-118
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Emotional regulation as assessed by DERS
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Aggressive behaviors as assessed by MOAS
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Alexithymia as assessed by TAS-20
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Close relationships and attachment patterns as assessed by ECR
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Selfharming behaviors as assessed by LPC
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Specialist mental health service utilization I as assessed by specific interview
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Specialist mental health service utilization II as assessed by specific interview
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Specialist mental health service utilization III as assessed by specific interview
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Specialist mental health service treatment as assessed by specific interview
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Welfare services as assessed by specific interview
Timeframe: 2019-2021
Age at first contact with specialist mental health services as assessed by specific interview
Timeframe: 2019-2021