This post-market study is to show that dental implants with a SLActive® surface (SLActive® implants) show non-inferior clinical performance compared to dental implants with a SLA® surface (SLA® implants). The primary hypothesis is that 12 months after implant loading, the bone loss around the SLActive® implants will not be appreciably greater than around the SLA® implants. The occurrence of adverse events and device deficiencies will also be recorded to confirm once more the safety of the Straumann® Bone Level Tapered (BLT), Roxolid® implant. Osseointegration and anti-inflammatory potential of SLActive® implants will be evaluated in the study as secondary endpoints.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Bone Level Change 12 Months After Implant Loading
Timeframe: 12 months after implant loading
Occurrence of Adverse Device Effects and Device Deficiencies That Could Have Led to a Serious Adverse Device Effect
Timeframe: 12 months after implant loading