Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Study of Early Intervention for Desensitization (NCT03736447) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
Peanut Oral Immunotherapy Study of Early Intervention for Desensitization
United States, France, Germany146 participantsStarted 2018-12-27
Plain-language summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of AR101 in peanut-allergic children aged 1 to \< 4 years.
Who can participate
Age range
1 Year – 3 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Aged 1 to \< 4 years at randomization.
* Written informed consent from the legal guardian/parent (or both parents where required by local authorities). Provide assent where required and as appropriate per local requirements.
* Sensitivity to peanut, defined as one of the following:
* No known history of peanut ingestion and has serum IgE to peanut ≥ 5 kUA/L within 12 months before randomization.
* Documented history of physician-diagnosed IgE-mediated peanut allergy that includes the onset of characteristic\* signs and symptoms of allergy within 2 hours of known oral exposure to peanut or peanut-containing food, and has a mean wheal diameter on skin prick test (SPT) to peanut of at least 3 mm greater than the negative control (diluent) or serum IgE to peanut ≥ 0.35 kUA/L, obtained within 12 months before randomization.
* Development of age-appropriate dose-limiting allergy symptoms after consuming single doses of peanut protein \> 3 mg to ≤ 300 mg in a screening DBPCFC.
* A palatable vehicle food to which the subject is not allergic must be available for administering study product.
Exclusion Criteria:
* History of severe or life-threatening anaphylaxis anytime before the screening DBPCFC.
* History of hemodynamically significant cardiovascular or renovascular disease, including uncontrolled or inadequately controlled hypertension.
* History of biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of EoE; other eosinophilic GI disease; chronic, recurrent, or severe gastroe…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Percentage of Subjects Who Tolerated a Single Highest Dose of at Least 600 mg in the Exit Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC)